We on the Right have generally recognized and accepted, up to now, that Statism was their world view and we just needed to counter it. The "JournoList" shows that they plan and talk about subverting conservatives and Republicans, often in vicious and vile ways.
This was a private chat room, if you will, that has since been closed down. Of course they say it's not big deal, much ado about nothing. Not, of course, like the 'vast right wing conspiracy'. Need I say it? If Conservatives had a similar chat venue, it would lead every Jurassic Press (alleged) newscast for days.
Some quotes:
Sarah Spitz, a producer for National Public Radio, commenting what she would do if she saw Rush Limbaugh on the floor dying of a heart attack: “Laugh loudly like a maniac and watch his eyes bug out...” “I never knew I had this much hate in me.” But he deserves it.” She later issued an apology, saying it really wasn't her, she's not really that kind of person. Like Rush pointed out, 'then who was it?' Did somebody take over her body and force her to say those vile things?
Bloomberg’s Ryan Donmoyer at the beginning of the TEA Party movement, when they were showing up at town hall meetings: “You know, at the risk of violating Godwin’s law, is anyone starting to see parallels here between the teabaggers and their tactics and the rise of the Brownshirts?” “Esp. Now that it’s getting violent? Reminds me of the Beer Hall fracases of the 1920s.” Really? They were running through the streets destroying property and beating liberals? They were rounding people up and sending them to prisons?
Richard Yeselson, freelance liberal writer and researcher: “They want a deficit driven militarist/heterosexist/herrenvolk state. “This is core of the Bush/Cheney base transmorgrified into an even more explicitly racialized/anti-cosmopolitan constituency. Why? Um, because the president is a black guy named Barack Hussein Obama. But it’s all the same old nuts in the same old bins with some new labels: the gun nuts, the anti tax nuts, the religious nuts, the homophobes, the anti-feminists, the anti-abortion lunatics, the racist/confederate crackpots, the anti-immigration whackos (who feel Bush betrayed them) the pathological government haters (which subsumes some of the othercategories, like the gun nuts and the anti-tax nuts).”
We expect people like this to be reporters with a foundation of honesty and integrity?
A Blogger Lindsay Beyerstein: “I’m not saying these guys are capital F-fascists, but they don’t want limited government. Their desired end looks more like a corporate state than a rugged individualist paradise. The rank and file wants a state that will reach into the intimate of citizens when it comes to sex, reproductive freedom, censorship, and rampant incarceration in the name of law and order.” This guy talking about a conservative or Republican corporate state. Aren't the Dems the ones engaging in corporate cronyism pumping $billions into corporations and hiring their CEO's into cabinet positions or making them unaccountable czars?
Another blogger, Ed Kilgore, in response to noted military historian Victor Davis Hanson, to an article on immigration, not response to the subject itself, just: “...the kind of Old White Guy cultural reaction that is at the heart of the Tea Party Movement. It’s very close in spirit to the classic 1970s racist tome, The Camp of the Saints, where White Guys struggle to make up their minds whether to go out and murder brown people or just give up.”
Jonathan Zasloff, a law professor at UCLA, when they were doing their standard myopic rant on Fox News: “I hate to open this can of worms, “but is there any reason why the FCC couldn't’t simply pull their broadcasting permit once it expires?” Really? This guy is a law professor. Has he read the Constitution? Does he know about no abridgment of free speech? Freedom of the press? Does he know FNC does not broadcast, it's cable? Good grief.
The Jurassic Press is only for freedom of the press and free speech if what they put out is the only thing being put out, and the free speech is only for them and those that agree with them.
The original article from the "Daily Caller" here, and Fred Barnes take on it here. Fred Barnes was a topic of discussion on the JournoList.
This is also where they hatched the idea to call everyone that disagrees with the Statist agenda and Obama's plans to socialize America was hatched. It appears to be backfiring now. Spencer Ackerman of The Washington Independent: "If the right forces us all to either defend Wright or tear him down, no matter what we choose, we lose the game they've put upon us. Instead, take one of them—Fred Barnes, Karl Rove, who cares—and call them racists. . . . This makes them 'sputter' with rage, which in turn leads to overreaction and self-destruction."
Here's an article that links 106 of the 400 participants to various communist and socialist organizations. All these participants are "progressives". You won't find a Constitutionalist or conservative among them. A couple groups connected to these people are the Democratic Socialists of America and Institute for Policy Studies, which you won't find on this blog site in my "think tank" section because it's no more than a part of this administration's Ministry of Propaganda. This is a fascinating look at who is actually writing for the Jurassic Press and what their connections are. Of course George Soros is wrapped up with these guys. He's a foreigner that has made $billions crumbling the economies of nations, and is now here financing the overthrow of our Constitutional Republic. His Open Society website here.
This is the Jurassic Press. I'm happy to be, in my own small way, part of the new media.
No comments:
Post a Comment