Back To: Republicans Want Dirty Air and Dirty Water

The Democrat Leadership, such as it is, actually believe Republicans' agenda is to poison the air and water and kill babies. This is noting new, I first saw it on CSPAN in the 1980's in a debate. I think I remember Gephart and Dahshal as the Democrats, and one of them actually said Republicans want dirty air and water. I was stunned by the stupidity then, and I am now. This passes for debate and intelligence. Reid and Pelosi have replaced them, say the same stupid stuff, and get away with it in the Jurassic Press. Those two latter knuckleheads have also said people receiving food stamps and unemployment checks stimulates the economy.

http://youtu.be/WX_Ep63bq8g

Not Brought To You By The Re-Elect Obama Press

There were some major stories this week the Re-elect Obama Press neglected to cover. The biggest one not reported by what they tout as their biggest news programs, or news oriented programs, "Good Morning America", "Today" and "CBS This Morning" did not report the House vote to repeal of ObamaCare, and the Democrat's refusing to bring it to a vote in the Senate. On "World News Tonight" and the  CBS Evening News", alleged journalists Diane Sawyer and Scott Pelly, respectively, whined about how horrible it was. Back when I learned journalism, a distinction was made between news and views. Straight up reporting by the pretend pseudo "journalists" would to be just saying, this was the vote, this is how it broke down, who voted yea or nay and why, and what Congressmen and Senators had to say. Period.

What is important to these knuckleheads so far this week is them running with the Democrat talking points that Romney is evil because he's rich, and because he doesn't release his tax returns from the dawn of forever, and why does he have overseas investments, and have money in overseas banks, yada yada yada. What they didn't report is DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz has investments in Swiss Banks,  including Julius Baer Group Ltd. and the State Bank of India GDR Ltd. This is from her disclosure forms required by law for politicians. Here's a few more; Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund, British HSBC Bank, Rakuten (a Japanese shipping business), Hengdeli Holdings (a Hong Kong watch company), Richemont Cie Financiere (a Swiss luxury goods company), Novo Nordisk (a Danish drug company), Volkswagen (German auto company), to name a few. She's demanded Romney release all his financial information for all his adult life, yet refuses to release her own.

The first female ex-Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, demands the same. She's invested heavily in an investment firm specializing in Asia investments, ”Matthews International Capital Management LLC". She's made somewhere between one and five $million. It's hard to say because she refuses to release her financial information like she's demanding of Romney.

The re-elect Obama Press has not reported these investments. Real journalists would report what is being said about Romney and his finances, and balance it with this known info, or lack of it, by his Democrat accusers. He's rich, so it must be dirty and illegal. Well, the alleged journalists are Democrats, so don't color us surprised.

There's no such thing as "insourcing"; alleged journalists and their minders in the Democrat Party made it up. That Romney and Bain sent whatever amount of jobs overseas is just not provable. No one can name specifically what companies sent how many jobs to what country and how many people. Obama with tax payer money, the "stimulus package"  and other Obama policies created jobs or sent money to Finland, New Zealand, Indonesia, India, Mexico, Germany, Australia, Switzerland, China, Denmark, South Korea, the Dominican Republic, Thailand, Vietnam, Italy, Russia, Luxembourg, El Salvador, Great Britain, Spain, Japan, and France. Obama calls this "insourcing". Certainly changes the meaning of the word.

At the end of Romney's speech to the NAACP he got a standing O. Not reported. 

Just a couple things not reported in the Re-elect Obama Press this week.

Religion of the State vs Religion of God

Alleged journalist and Leftist political hack, and anti Christian bigot Chris Matthews, said when the Catholic Church sued against the health care mandate to provide contraception, sterilization and abortion against religious belief and tradition, asked "Do you think they’re all Republican, the bishops?" Matthews himself is a Catholic, or claims to be, and definitely a Democrat. A 2011 Pew study showed 48% of Catholics are Democrats as opposed to 43% Republican.

Leftists\Democrats, are myopically political, so even see religion as politically motivated. They're incapable of knowing, or even seeing it's the other way around. Religious people put God first, in everything we think, say, and do. What we get then are Democrats that claim to be Catholic supporting abortion and gay marriage, even advocating for it. Nancy Pelosi, asked by  Christopher Goins of CNSNews.com,“Many of the people that are opposed to gay marriage cite their religion as the reason why they're opposed. You're a Catholic that supports gay marriage. Do you believe that religion and the idea that you can support gay marriage can be separated? And how do you grapple with the idea that you support gay marriage as a Catholic?” Her answer:  "My religion has, compels me--and I love it for it--to be against discrimination of any kind in our country, and I consider this a form of discrimination. I think it’s unconstitutional on top of that. "  That despite the very clear teaching and position of the Catholic Church to the contrary. Plus her dismissal several times of the Constitution and not being bound by it.

Back to the point of the politics informing Faith, Matthews has said: "I think there are people who have chosen to convert to the Catholic faith because they don't like the liberal positions taken by their sectarian groups. That's a fact. So, you can write that down. No, you can write that down."  Huh? People join the Church because of political reasons? Certainly makes my point. I wonder too why he doesn't quit the Catholic Church since it's against everything he's for. What studies is he referencing?

There have been several Democrats that have held office, claiming to be Catholic, yet passing legislation for abortion, sterilization and contraception against the teachings of the Church they claim to belong to. Plus use taxes to pay for these against the will of citizens that object to these practices.  The rationalization for it is they don't want to enforce their beliefs on others, but they will force obedience to the healthcare mandates,  claim separation of church and state is in the Constitution (it's not), and claim the Establishment Clause is to protect citizens from religion (it doesn't).  I'm sure we can all come up with long lists of things the government forces we citizens to do that are against our beliefs.

If these politicians were true practitioners of their religion, when campaigning would say they cannot vote for certain things because it's against their faith belief, then follow though in practice if elected. Truly religious people put God first, and He informs how we act. Politics trumps religion for Leftists\Democrats, and if a politician put his\her politics before religion, God, and the Church they should quit the Church, and state their religion is the State. If they don't they're immersing themselves in hypocrisy and should stop throwing stones at people that proclaim Faith and make errors in judgment and behavior at odds with their usual behavior and beliefs.

   

Best Summation of Fast and Furious Ever!

Summation of Fast and Furious

http://youtu.be/C6RFylFMSHo

Gowdy on Peloisi (Bonus vid)

http://youtu.be/S9CiTTVLh3g

Yet More Attacks on Christianity by Our Secularist, Bigoted President & His Party

This President and his political party have made it abundantly clear they are Secularists, and specifically anti-Christian. Here’s a few items to make the point.

I had written earlier that I’m disgusted by the use of Our Savior Jesus Christ being used as a political pawn. The anti-Christian bigot Obama did just that when he attended a prayer breakfast and used the time meant for communing with God to make a Marxist campaign speech, saying Jesus' admonition to help the poor means the government must raise taxes, especially on the rich.

Obama: “When I talk about shared responsibility, it’s because I genuinely believe that in a time when many folks are struggling and at a time when we have enormous deficits, it’s hard for me to ask seniors on a fixed income or young people with student loans or middle-class families who can barely pay the bills to shoulder the burden alone.”  … “And I think to myself, if I’m willing to give something up as somebody who’s been extraordinarily blessed and give up some of the tax breaks that I enjoy, I actually think that’s going to make economic sense.”

“But for me as a Christian, it also coincides with Jesus’ teaching that, ‘for unto whom much is given, much shall be required.’”

He added this even more appalling observation:  “…mirrors the Islamic belief that those who’ve been blessed have an obligation to use those blessings to help others, or the Jewish doctrine of moderation and consideration for others.” Since Christianity came first, and Islam imperfectly picked and chose what it wanted and needed to oppress people, I don’t think so.

http://youtu.be/jRA6l-VCttg

The quote, “Unto whomsoever much is given, of him shall be much required,” does not mean from each according to his ability and to each according to his needs. Obama sees everything through Marxist lenses. It’s his religion.

Part of that religion is to ignore the establishment clause of the Constitution (and the rest of the Constitution too, but I need to stay on point), “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion” and the free exercise clause, "... or prohibiting the free exercise thereof". The latest kerfuffle is his forcing the Catholic Church to adhere to his secular religion, which advocates the killing of babies, i.e., abortion, over the life of babies. Add to that forcing, against the teaching/values/beliefs of the Church requiring them to provide contraception. This Administration ruling forcing the church to provide abortions, sterilizations, and contraceptives as part of their health care programs is a requirement from Health and Human Services Department, not even legislation. They can get away with it because, contrary to what was said to the public by Obama and the Democrats, mandating abortion is in ObamaCare. This doesn’t only apply to the Catholic Church, but to all religious organizations; if the Catholic Church and other organizations stick to their guns on this, many religious funded hospitals, health facilities and companies will be forced to shut down. The Obama administration isn’t entirely insensitive to this issue; all the affiliated organizations have a year before being forced to comply or shut down.

Archbishop Timothy Nolan has published a letter to the president in protest, and there are several with some variations from many Bishops in America. A copy of one is at the bottom of this article.

He's also forbidden Chaplin's in the military to comment on this abuse of power, this ignoring of the Constitution, this forcing of Religion, specifically Christianity, to ignore and reject the teachings of their respective churches. He is Commander in Chief and has the legal right to do so, but not the moral right. 

Recently struck down by the Supreme Court, and not reported or under reported by the re-elect Obama press, was a ruling requiring Churches to adhere to equal opportunity legislation. This requires the Catholic Church to allow female priests, and Jews female rabbis. You may color me wrong on this, but aren’t elected officials sworn to uphold the Constitution? If I’m right, the Secularists in power that took that oath are definitely ignoring both the establishment clause and free exercise clause.

Off on a tangent here; the first female ex-Speaker of the House, a professed Catholic, stated about the issue: “First of all, I am going to stick with my fellow Catholics in supporting the administration on this. I think it was a very courageous decision that they made, and I support it.” Say what? She’s one of many Catholic politicians that are pro-abortion and contraception ignoring the teachings of the Church she professes to be a member of. For most of us practicing Christians, God comes first, and informs our beliefs and actions. If one is a politician, and speaks honestly about his\her Faith, they should let it be known and live by it. I think if a Catholic runs for office on a pro-abortion platform, or lives and legislates in opposition to the Church, they should renounce the Church. If not, and I’m not Catholic, so I don’t know how exactly this works, but if they stay in the Church and support the kinds of regulation written about here, they should be excommunicated. It shouldn’t bother these anti-Christian, anti-Catholic Catholics anyway since they apparently don’t believe or practice Church doctrine.  

There’s a whole section of the Bible discussing Spiritual Warfare, mostly in Ephesians 6: 10- 18. This is where it manifests itself in physical world. We have the leader of the free world leading an assault on Christianity (and supporting Islam). Good for the Catholic Church for standing up to these bigots and secularists.

If I Were a Liberal\Democrat I Would Be Concerned Because This Is What the Democrat Party Represents

I've written many times on this blog the Left, officially represented by the Democrat Party, is racist, homophobic and violent. There are vids of Pelosi, Reid and Obama making supporting statements of the "Occupy" protests. This is born out by the vids below, taken during the "Occupy Wall Street" and the other offshoot "Occupy" protests than sprang up the past week. Obama, Pelosi, Reid and other Democrat leaders that called the TEA Party violent and racist support these knuckleheads. TEA Party protests had mom and dad in Docker khaki's and sundress with little daughter or son that picked up the trash and put it in the proper receptacle. There were no clashes with the police, no breaking into buildings, no public defecation, no fights, no destruction of property, no arrests. The Leftists and Dems are against civil, legal behavior and support the kind of behavior shown below.

Invading the Air Space Museum. These anti-coporationists are using smart phones, cameras, one guy has a Panasonic shirt on. Don't remember any TEA Party protesters doing anything like this.

http://youtu.be/Wo1K98Jr4jo

Homophobic Leftists. Can you imagine if a TEA Party person said this. It would be the lede story on CBS, MSNBC, NBC, ABC, CNN...

http://youtu.be/akseCQziD7E

Leftist Protester taking a shit on a police car. Never saw a TEA Party protester do anything like this.

About 700 Leftist protesters get arrested. How many TEA Party protesters have been arrested? 0

http://youtu.be/o_1bYVMwg8k

Those TEA Party people are crazy. Indeed.

http://youtu.be/s0qkbQfszp0

In San Francisco, in your face, and don't even know what they're protesting. TEA Party protesters are very clear...Less Taxes (Taxed Enough Already) and smaller government.

http://sacramento.cbslocal.com/video?autoStart=true&topVideoCatNo=default&clipId=6327017

Leftist Anti-Semitism

http://youtu.be/l3Y9CARUwio

More Leftist Anti-Semitism. President Obama is a Jewish puppet.

http://youtu.be/NWwK5TBcoUY

All this, supported by the Democrat Party, Unions, Communist Party of America.

Waiver Mania

Dems and Obama, instead of waving the flag, are waiving ObamaCare. Extreme Leftist Radical and first female ex-Speaker of the House have gotten a lot of waivers from participating in the Obama healthcare shakedown of the American people. This past April the Obama Administration has granted another 204 waivers from ObamaCare, the system that was to bring us better healthcare at lower cost.

Of those 204 waivers, 38 are in Nancy Pelosi’s district. Gotta ask Nancy, if the law is so good why are so many being granted waivers? Of course she denies having anything to do with getting these companies in her district the waivers. Really and truly? Twenty percent of these latest waivers going to a specific district just kinda happened?

So far the Obama Administration has given 1,372 businesses and eight states waivers. Got to ask again, if this healthcare legislation is such a great deal, why all the waivers? We were told that it would be cheaper and better. Love it too that so many of the unions that advocated for ObamaCare are getting out because it’s too expensive; and it hasn’t even taken full effect yet. Unions make up about 11.9% of the workforce, yet 50.26% of the waivers so far have gone to them.

The latest waiver has gone to one of the largest Leftist lobbies, the AARP, who pushed mightily for this government takeover of our personal health.

Of course all these unions, lobbies and businesses are huge donors to Obama and the Dems. One can extend the idea that besides waivers, the cost and quality of healthcare down the road will depend upon one’s political affiliation.  

Changin' of the Speakers

Those Horrible Little American Citizens

From the woman that was the first to call TEA Party participants Nazis, we now have calls from her for an investigation about the Mosque of Triumph to be built near Ground Zero, costing $100 Million. An investigation about who's financing the mosque? No, who's financing the opposition to it. How dare 70% of those stupid little citizens oppose a national insult.

Nancy Peolsi:
"There is no question there is a concerted effort to make this a political issue by some. And I join those who have called for looking into how is this opposition to the mosque being funded."... "How is this being ginned up that here we are talking about Treasure Island, something we've been working on for decades, something of great interest to our community as we go forward to an election about the future of our country and two of the first three questions are about a zoning issue in New York City."

What she and other Democrats don't understand is grassroots feelings and ideas, a welling up of sentiment and an exercise of freedom of regular people agreeing on something. They are totally top down control freaks, and if Liberals oppose anything, they designate a leader, use the funds they have (usually tax payer dollars) and force what they want on others. They don't understand the people. They don't present an argument for their ideas and policies.

What they do well is name calling. The newest is if you oppose the Mosque of Triumph you're and Islamophobe. Add to that, if you oppose Obama's destructive policies you're a racist. If you want the traditional institution of marriage, between a man and a woman, you're a homophobe.

It's sad for our county that a person like this, that detests liberty and capitalism, is third in line for the presidency of the United States. Then again we have a president and vice president with the same view. Interesting that about 70% of the people oppose the mosque, about 70% opposed ObamaCare, about 70% opposed the stimulus packages, about 70% oppose the latest financial regulatory legislation. Not surprising congress has an 11% approval rating.

Religious and Political Integrity

There's a disconnect between Liberal politicians and their professed religious beliefs. We have politicians like the late Ted Kennedy that was Catholic and supported abortion, and Nancy Pelosi that supports abortion and other un-Catholic ideas. She's even been chastised by the Pope, and then lied about even that.

I wonder, if you claim to be of a particular faith, why run as a politician with an agenda antithetical to that faith? I have the same problem with Jews that as a block support the anti-Israel, antisemitic Democrat party; or Blacks that vote Democrat in block when the Democrat Party subjugates Blacks with the view that they don't have what it takes to be successful and must depend on the State. Victims.

The word "integrity" comes from the Latin "integer", to be whole, complete. Integrity is to have consistency of values, beliefs and principles. A hard thing to do. If you fail in presenting integrity, then you're a hypocrite.

I have to wonder why Statist politicians that advocate for abortion when their Church and Faith is against it aren't called hypocrites. Yet when someone that is not a Statist falls short of living up to their stated beliefs, they are called a hypocrite. I'm thinking of the non-Statist politician that has an affair, or is outed as a homosexual, or is caught coming out of a strip club. They are hypocrites. The Statist politician that claims adherence to a Faith that doesn't practice it, is not a hypocrite. They are given a pass on non-traditional, even deviant behavior.

Liberal politicians embrace the Marxist secular view, present that to the public, and justify the disconnect between religious belief and political belief by saying they don't want to subject their constituents to their own religious beliefs. Why run advocating positions antithetical to your professed Faith? I have to ask, if you don't fully embrace the tenants of your religion, and have integrity between political and religious world views, why state you do? If your ethics and morality are situational, why not just state you believe in situational ethics? Obviously to gain power and money. I would like to see politicians like Catholic Pelosi and Lieberman (an orthodox Jew) actually say they put the State before God. That would be integrity.

I would like too for non-Statist politicians that claim adherence to religious beliefs to keep their pants zipped for one, and adhere to other correct religious behaviors at least while in office. If you can't, don't run. Statists get a pass, religious people don't.

Non-Statist politicians advocating for traditional values, for the rule of law, for the Constitution which makes it clear in its own language that our freedoms are granted by God, must absolutely live according to those beliefs and values. Not to do so imperils Liberty just as much as Statists enforcing Marxist ideology.

Some nonsensical rambling from the hypocrite Pelosi

Yet More Unread Legislation

They didn't read the Health Care/Health Insurance smack down legislation.

They didn't read AZ SB1070 Bill.

Now they have passed, after staying up all night, a bill that will be the final fascist takeover of the financial sector of the economy. Heard something like this before? Sen. Chris Dodd (D-Conn.), chairman of the Senate Banking Committee: "No one will know until this is actually in place how it works. But we believe we've done something that has been needed for a long time. It took a crisis to bring us to the point where we could actually get this job done." (Never let a crisis go to waste.)

Nancy Pelosi on Obamacare Bill: "But we have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it, away from the fog of the controversy."

All the gory details of this takeover of the financial sector of the economy is here. About 2,000 pages of legislative gobbledegook that will touch every aspect of your life that will not be touched by ObamaCare and whatever Cap and Trade controls the Dems can ram through against the will of the American people.