May each of you have the heart to conceive, the understanding to direct, and the hand to execute works that will leave the world a little better for your having been here. -- Ronald Reagan

Showing posts with label Illegal Immigration. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Illegal Immigration. Show all posts

Sunday, August 17, 2014

Our Lawless President Reviewed...A Summation of Some of the Worst Violations of Law and the Constitution

I haven’t written a post in months, passing through a negative period of ‘what’s the point’? Everything that works, that is good, is under attack. Those are supported by the Jurassic Press, and unless folks read the conservative media, the word just doesn’t get out. (Obama and Eric Holder ordered criminal investigations against Fox News following the 2012 elections.) We have a lawless U.S. president and his political party, a culture that is aggressively for anything that is silly, stupid, damaging or demeaning to good people and traditions that work, and Christians getting slaughtered with what appears to be a tacit approval by Leftists/Democrats and our president. (A result I think of Obama and his Party's antisemitism.)

I need to get back to it. Contribute my little bit. Writing helps commit things to memory, clarifies thinking, and maybe someone not aware of an issue will be introduced to it. Surprisingly, and gratefully, when I was posting nearly daily, I had a pretty solid readership. For that I’m eternally thankful.

All that follows here is linked to our lawless president. Starting with immigration. He and his Party have kept it at the top of their agenda, even though poll after poll showed it’s really low in importance to citizens. That’s until recently though, when he solicited, back in January of this year (documents prove), to have thousands of “children” invade our borders and create a humanitarian crises. His plan is coming to fruition now. He’s spending $millions on this and planting them in communities all over the country without warning causing tremendous burdens. A large number of them aren’t children at all but juvenile gang-bangers with criminal records.

No deportation is in the offing. Prior to this executive ordered humanitarian disaster deportations were not happening. The president has about 300,000 people that should be, but he doesn’t. They’re just processed, given a court date to return, then don’t. At the same time he says he has the highest deportation rate of any president, but does that by including illegals that get turned back at the border when caught (they come back later). That has never been done by any president. The “Dream Act” was rejected by Congress, which would have made legal tens of thousands of illegals permanent residents. So he wrote an executive order which is essentially the Dream Act. That is illegal and unconstitutional. The executive branch cannot write and enforce legislation. He does this because he is an advocate of open borders, and thinks, probably correctly, that once illegally given the right to vote, will vote Democrat. 

Also at the border he’s supposed to build a fence. The 2006 Secure Fence Act requires this by law, and he’s ignored it. This is illegal and unconstitutional. The Israeli’s built one, with only good results. We’re talking about only 650 miles, which would save $trillions by at least slowing down the illegal mass migration. Remember he sued Arizona, supporting an illegal lawsuit by the Mexican government, against legislation supporting already existing Federal border laws. The Mexicans law suit was against Arizona enforcing U.S. immigration and border laws.  I was stunned that even this corrupt executive and Dept of “Justice” would support a foreign government’s lawsuit against an American State.

Moving within the borders of our country, he selectively administers ObamaCare to assist his supporters, Leftists, Democrats, that are inconvenienced by the law. It is illegal and unconstitutional to selectively enforce the law. Some of the things in his and the Democrat Party's law are so egregious they must be put off until after this year's midterms. He uses it to oppress religion (Christians being the focus) and the second amendment’s right to bear arms. He does the latter by making it a requirement of healthcare law for doctors and medical organizations to ask patients if they own guns, then report it to the government. Then there’s the well documented anti-religious (anti-Christian) forcing of businesses to violate their religious beliefs and traditions and obey the selectively enforced “healthcare” act.  Remember, this act was passed only by the Democrat Party in the dead of night on a holiday in December, and made possible with bribes and threats. Just as a reminder of the most noted bribes, there was Senator Ben Nelson of Nebraska with the "Cornhusker Kickback" and Senator Mary Landrieu with the $300 million "Louisiana Purchase." This “law” violates the First Amendment and the 1993 Religious Freedom Restoration Act.  It has thrown thousands, if not millions, of citizens out of their health insurance policies, or has risen the costs so high as to be unaffordable. I know mine has gone up, but only by a couple, three $hundred a year, so I’ve been able to handle it so far.

About costs, remember too that Obama said, while lying that we could all keep our doctors and insurance policies, that his healthcare law would cost under a $trillion. So far it’s about $2.4 trillion. The CBO says we’re actually looking at $10 trillion and it will grow, and at the same time stole $716 billion from Medicare (and lied the Republicans did it).  Why adding this financial burden on the productive people of this country, ones that are taking care of themselves and families in the first place (not costing the government), is seen as a good thing is not a mystery. It’s the last piece of the plan to control citizens. Then through it all your personal and private health issues are controlled by the government, guns controlled, religion controlled, business additional control.

Back to the border for a minute. Remember “Fast and Furious”? Obama and his “Justice” department are still stonewalling, refusing to respond, illegally and unconstitutionally to congressional subpoenas. He sent thousands of weapons across the Mexican border to arm drug cartels that resulted in the deaths of several hundred people and an American border patrol agent. My view is he and Eric Holder are accessories to murder.

Speaking of accessories to murder, the same is true for Obama and Hillary Clinton for Benghazi. They both ignored, then lied about in a massive cover-up the murder of four American citizens, representatives of our government, on sovereign US territory (the embassy). They both apparently went to bed while the attack was in progress, and the next day Obama flew off to a fund raiser.

The “justice” department under Eric Holder, bringing him up again, has refused to prosecute blacks, and a whistle blower had documents to prove it, and quit because of it. Holder’s department promotes voter fraud if it benefits the Democrat Party. He and Obama filed suit to stop voter ID, and has sued both Arizona and Alabama on their voter laws.

He has his executive branch departments write lots of regulations, which are in fact illegal taxation legislation that causes businesses to shut down because they can’t afford to implement them. The coal industry has been most notably crushed by this. He did say he wanted to raise the price of energy. He’s illegally shut down the Yucca Mountain nuclear repository. Regardless of the environmental controversy, it’s still unconstitutional and illegal.

His EEOC, “Equal” Opportunity Commission, sided with a minister in a Michigan church that sued to get her job back. She was fired by the church because she rejected the church’s doctrines. When did this become the business of the executive branch of government? Well, since this president decided he must control (Christian) religion.  

Then of course is his political enemies list and his use of the IRS to persecute and repress them. Nixon thought about doing this, and was threatened with impeachment which was backed by his own Party. Nixon was caught conspiring to do this and a few other things, many things Obama has in fact done, and resigned from office. Obama is given a pass.

These are just a few of the illegal and unconstitutional actions this president has taken, that upset this citizen the most, and this post would get even longer if I continued. Probably even this is too long.


Unbelievably he has done more social and economic damage than Carter, and broken more laws than any other president. First we must, in the upcoming midterm elections get some more conservatives in congress, and hopefully get a majority in the Senate (entirely possible despite what Dems, RINO’s and the Jurassic Press say); that can support the next president, hopefully a conservative even though the Republican elite are against it, and rescind all the law breaking executive orders and repeal ObamaCare. Jobs one and two.  

There was a Facebook post that said something to the effect that Obama could feed a baby into a wood-chipper on national television and would get away with it.


Saturday, June 16, 2012

Let's Play What if a Republican!


It’s astonishing nearly half the country still supports this president. Nixon was run out of office by both Republicans and Democrats for covering up the Watergate break in, and no one really knows what that was all about. Gerald Ford was given grief for pardoning Nixon, but it turns out it was the right thing to do, for the reasons he gave. GW Bush got Congressional approval for everything he did; TARP, both Middle East wars, the tax cuts, weapons sales to foreign countries, raising the debt ceiling, sending terrorists to foreign counties for interrogation, and whatever else. Democrats and other Leftists can call him a criminal for whatever, but the plain fact is, he never violated or ignored the Constitution. Listening to all the charges thrown at Republican presidents, all the accusations of criminality versus this president’s actions in violation of the Constitution he was sworn to uphold, one must wonder.

Wonder what if a Republican actually did what this president has done?  

The “Dream Act” was rejected by Congress. This past week he stated he was ignoring that, and granted amnesty to about a million Mexicans in this country illegally. It was directed at young Mexicans living here, and was a part of the “Dream Act”. What if a Republican president decided to ignore a vote of Congress and sign an executive order claiming it was now law?

The “Defense of Marriage Act” is a Federal Law. Obama directed his Justice Department to not enforce it. What if a Republican president made a pronouncement that even though he had sworn to uphold the laws of the United States, he would not enforce a specific law?

Since he’s taken office, unemployment went from 5.4% to over 8%. After stating it would never rise to 8%, he now says it’s the new norm, get used to it. (Actual unemployed is closer to 17%; people no longer looking for work, or can no longer draw unemployment are not counted.) What if a Republican more than doubled unemployment on his watch, and told everybody to get used to it?

A business moves operations to another state to reduce manufacturing costs. This president sues them to stop the move, because it's a right to work state; unions don’t have coercion power there. That’s his biggest money and power source. What if a Republican sued a company so they couldn’t move because his biggest donors don’t like it?

This president has refused to enforce immigration law. His latest action granting a million Mexicans here illegally amnesty, shows his contempt for Congress and the separation of powers, which are clearly stated in the Constitution. A border state decides to enforce the law. This president, with a foreign country, joined in a law suit against the state. What if a Republican refused to enforce a law and a state decided to, and he sued the state (with a foreign country)?

Another state he's suing, Florida, is because they are purging dead people and illegals from the voting registers. What if a Republican sued a state for making voting fair and legal? 

This president’s law enforcement agencies sold guns to Mexican gun cartels, hundreds of Mexicans and a US Border Patrol agent are murdered by those guns. Then Congress subpoenas the Attorney General of the US, who stonewalls for two years, and is caught in lie after lie. He refuses to produce documents requested by Congress. What if a Republican broke the law, got people murdered, lied about, and stonewalled Congress for two years?

This president in the dead of night, on a holiday, passed his health care legislation, with no votes from the opposition party and over the objection of more than half the citizens of the country. His lead congressman says they’ll have to pass it to see what’s in it. What if Republicans passed legislation most people didn’t want, that nobody has read, and most don't know all of what's in it, in the dead of night on a holiday, and the opposition party did not vote for at all?

Through that health care legislation, he's tried to force the Catholic Church specifically, and Christian generally, to renounce tradition, dogma, doctrine and belief (contraception, sterilization and abortion) and force them to obey the government under penalty of law. What if a Republican tried and force an organization to reject their beliefs to obey the government?  

This president has shut down offshore drilling, and doesn’t have the Constitutional authority to do so. After the BP oil spill he waited 40 days before taking action. What if a Republican waited 40 days to act on any disaster? What if a Republican shut down a major sector of an industry, and could only do so by ignoring the Constitution?

Billions of dollars have been given to “green” companies that have been failing massively. Those $billions are taxpayer dollars, and a lot of that money found its way back into the campaign coffers of the president. Leftists can contend it’s not so, it just appears that way at worst. What if a Republican gifted $billions to his favorite companies and they failed, and mega money found its way back (or appeared to) to the Republican campaign?

A friendly country, Canada, will give us a massive petroleum infusion. It’ll create tens of thousands of jobs, substantially reduce energy costs for citizens, and reduce petroleum reliance on enemies of the United States. This president and his energy secretary have both said they want energy prices to go up (both on vid by the way). What if a Republican president said he wants to raise energy costs, stay reliant on enemy countries for oil, and didn’t want to employ people?

In three years this president has racked up more debt than all previous presidents combined, all the while blaming it on his predecessor. What if a Republican was voted in saying he would cut the deficit in half and tripled it instead, and blames his failure on his predecessor?

He’s ordered drones to fly over farmers and ranchers to enforce environmental “laws”. What if a Republican ordered drones to fly and spy on citizens without due process?

There are lots more examples of the double standard, of this president literally getting away with murder, of violating the Constitution and the rule of law.

Back to what astounds me. The slightest perceived transgression by a Republican, even when he follows the law, obeys the separation of powers, obeys the Constitution, Democrats, Leftists, and others against the tenants of  a constitutional republic, see more of a threat from someone obeying the law, than someone who ignores it. I posted a few vids of Democrats saying they aren’t bound by the Constitution, one of them Nancy Pelosi, who was Speaker of the House at the time.  


Tuesday, March 29, 2011

Obama Hoping Foreign Criminals in US Succeed


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Y1eAKbXk7E 
“And for a young person like that young woman that we just spoke to who’s going to school, doing all the right things, we want them to succeed."

He's focusing on going after criminals, and those deportations are up, and non-criminals deportations are down? Not to put too fine a point on it, but if you enter a country illegally, aren't you a criminal? Since the woman asking the question is holding up what appears to be her deportation papers, why isn't the chief law enforcement officer of the land sending people to deport her? A rhetorical question of course. Obama and the Dems need undocumented Democrats to vote for them. It's why the Dems fight having voters show a picture ID.

Thursday, August 5, 2010

If Mexico's So Great, What Are You Doing Here?

...and TEA Partiers are uncivil and threaten violence?








It's a Grievous Scene

This afternoon I heard an interview with Sue Krentz, wife of murdered Arizona rancher Robert Krentz. After she worked her way through the grief part of the interview, she began talking about the destruction of their ranch by the constant movement of illegals across their land. Word has it, if Krentz found one of them suffering from thirst or hunger of both, he would provide for them. Sue Krentz talked about the hardship trying to keep the cattle fed and rounded up that was the result of cut and broken fences. Just horrible destruction. Their ranch house had been broken into and over $700 worth of things were stolen.

This is where I grieve. I grieve for Arizonians that are being murdered, raped, robbed; that have to tolerate human and drug smuggling. Obama, US Attorney General Eric Holder, and the Democratic party are in fact supporting the Mexican Mafia and Drug Cartels by not enforcing the law on the borders. They are complicit in the the rape of [American] women. They are complicit in the murder of American Citizens.

Obama, Eric Holder, and the Democrats instead have filed a lawsuit against American Citizens for upholding the law. At the same time they support 'sanctuary cities' that aid and abet foreign criminals that come to our country, murder, rape, run drugs, smuggle humans, and strike fear into the hearts of American Citizens. These people swore to uphold the Constitution and enforce the law. Apparently, they've come to the conclusion that the oath meant only that the law be selectively enforced when it supports they agenda.

It goes beyond even that. When the American People decide they want specific laws and traditions, vote on them, and Obama, Holder and the Dems don't like it, they just get a judge to say that the law is unconstitutional.

The Citizens of Arizona said, hey Feds, you're not doing your job protecting us, so here's some State legislation to lay out how we're going to do it. Obama, Holder, and Dems got a judge to say the law is unconstitutional. Think on that. The Constitution is unconstitutional. At one time in this country, the "will of the people" meant something.

Now we're past the second time California citizens voted to amend their State Constitution that marriage is between a man and a woman. Obama, Holder, and the Dems found a [gay] judge to overthrow the wisdom and will of over 7 million people, finding the amendment unconstitutional. Think on it. The Constitution is unconstitutional. That the votes of a huge majority of American citizens can be ignored by one man in a black robe.

Obama, Holder, and the Dems are killing this country. They are killing the Constitution and the Rule of Law. They are literally aiding and abetting in the killing of American Citizens on the US/Mexican Border.

I grieve. So far about 47% of this country think this is okay. The support is dropping, so I do know this can be turned around. It just saddens me so many are willing to give up freedom to pretend that politicians want to take care of them. I grieve that so many in this country think someone should take care of them (47% of the country pay no taxes).

It gladdens me that now over 50% of the people are saying, Hey! Wait a minute!

November is not so far away. We must keep focused on stopping these ruling elites' support of open borders, the murder of US citizens while looking the other way, government funded abortion, political appointees in black robes ignoring the Constitution and will of the people, those same judges releasing pedophiles and rapists back onto the streets, thousands of pages of unread legislation that denies freedom and choice, fat cat Wall Streeters getting $billions of taxpayer money with no strings attached, and taxpayer money used to buy private companies that keep hemorrhaging money (except it's now ours). The list is long and getting longer, but I've got to stop.

Remember November!

Monday, August 2, 2010

Obama Sanctions Hit on Pinal County Sheriff


Both Sheriff Paul Babeu and Sheriff Joe Arpaio have both had hits put out on them by the Mexican Mafia and Mexican drug cartels. There have been contracts put out on border law enforcement before. This time though, our government, led by Obama and the Dems, have sided with the Mafia and Cartels.

Sheriff Babeu:
“What’s very troubling is the fact that at a time when we in law enforcement and our state need help from the federal government, instead of sending help they put up billboard-size signs warning our citizens to stay out of the desert in my county because of dangerous drug and human smuggling and weapons and bandits and all these other things and then, behind that, they drag us into court with the ACLU.”

“So who has partnered with the ACLU?” “It’s the president and (Attorney General) Eric Holder himself. And that’s simply outrageous.”

“Our own government has become our enemy and is taking us to court at a time when we need help.”

“If the president would do his job and secure the border; send 3,000 armed soldiers to the Arizona border and stop the illegal immigration and the drug smuggling and the violence, we wouldn’t even be in this position and where we’re forced to take matters into our own hands.”


Full article here.

Tuesday, July 6, 2010

Armed Invasion of AZ and Mexican Mafia Puts Hit on Pinal County Sheriff. Obama Sues AZ


FLORENCE, Ariz. -- Pinal County Sheriff Paul Babeu declined a security detail even after his department said he had received "credible" threats against his life.
The Pinal County Sheriff's Office issued a news release Monday saying that Babeu's outspoken statements about border security have led to such threats.
The Sheriff's Office said Babeu declined the security detail for budget reasons and because of limited staffing.
"We're representing the rule of law here in America,” Babeu told CBS 5 News. “And that is an affront to me more than it is troubling to me, you know? I'm more outraged by the fact that these people would dare to say such things or to put what is called a 'green light' against me."
Chief Deputy Steve Henry said the office has information about additional threats from the Mexican Mafia and drug cartel members that placed a "green light" on Babeu's life.
Henry said threats against the sheriff by foreign-born criminals have raised their concerns to a new level. “Green light” contracts include a hit man doing a job for money.
Babeu's sources from outside Arizona said the green light hit man is threatened with death and the death of his family if he doesn't carry out the murder.
"We've been saying this for four to six months, that the tactics have changed and it's becoming more violent," Babeu said.
Babeu was reluctant to talk about the threats, but did explain to CBS 5 News why he turned down the special security detail.
"Quite frankly, we don't have enough deputies to respond to our emergencies in Pinal County,” he said. ”We've got one deputy per 1000 citizens. Phoenix has 2.7 per thousand, just to give you a sense of what we're facing."
Babeu said he will not let the threat of violence change his course.
"For me, I'll be fine,” he said. “I always consider my environment. And I'm going to continue to speak out and be very aggressive and stand up for what we believe in, so it doesn't change anything for me." Story link here

Monday, July 5, 2010

The Can't Do Obama Administration

Other than violating the laws set forth in the Constitution, the Obama administration is the little train that can't. They are very close to having taken full governmental control of the automotive, health care, financial and energy private sector industries. Meanwhile, border security, military engagements, and providing an economic climate to allow for private sector job growth (how many times to liberals need to be told that government does not create jobs) lay fallow, things the federal government is specifically directed to do by the Constitution.

So they CAN'T protect our borders.


Homeland Security Sec Napolitano, CAN'T do anything about the border.


In Afghanistan, a nine year long war, most of the casualties have happened on Obama's watch. George Bush allowed this to be turned into a politically managed war like was done with Vietnam, with the same result. Lesson not learned. Obama is making it worse. From Jan. 20, 2009 to July 2, 2010, there were 452 combat-related deaths. That's more than half of the 900 combat-related deaths since Oct 2001 when we engaged in the operation. The top five deadliest months so far are:
1. June 2010 (59 casualties).
2. October 2009 (58 casualties).
3. August 2009 (51 deaths)
4. July 2009 (43 deaths)
5. September 2009 (37 deaths)
Several weeks ago I suggested that because we have an incompetent Commander in Chief, to save soldiers' lives, we should withdraw from Afghanistan. This bears out my contention.

The administration CAN'T fix the employment situation. It's time to despair for America's fiscal house. This is what passes for leadership with this administration. Vice President Joe Biden: "There's no possibility to restore 8 million jobs lost in the Great Recession." This was followed by the obligatory 'blame Bush', "We inherited a godawful mess." That was followed by a big lie, that 500,000 private sector jobs were created, and there's been a 4% growth in the economy. Huge lie, it just didn't happen, but of course the Jurassic Press did not do any fact checking or challenge his assertion. These statements were made at a fundraiser for Sen. Russ Feingold (D-Wisc.) in Milwaukee on June 26. The other big lie about the economy is 2.2 million to 2.8 million jobs were either saved or created because of the stimulus as of March 2010. What specific jobs were "saved" and how is that measured? According to data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, the economy has lost 4.4 million jobs, worse than Herbert Hoover, since Obama completed his first full month in office February 2009.

In international economics we CAN'T be the economic engine of the world. From U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner at the recent G20 summit, that basically, the US economy is a failure, will continue to be a failure, and the world needs to step it up. Here it is in economic/diplomatic gobbledygook: "Given the broader shifts under way in the U.S. economy towards higher domestic savings, without further progress on rebalancing global demand, global growth rates will fall short of potential." "In this context, we are concerned by the projected weakness in domestic demand in Europe and Japan." The US has been the economic engine of the world for nearly a century, and all the sudden we CAN'T?

According to this administration, we CAN'T do anything about the border, we CAN't do anything about unemployment, we CAN'T do anything about military loses in Afghanistan, we CAN't do anything about the US economy at the global level.

I never ever ever want any leader, in any situation, say that something CAN'T be done. The purpose of leadership is to get things done. Added to the CAN'T do list, is the WON'T do of the Gulf oil spill. This administration has done nothing but threaten law suits and blame people. The solution is here, and Obama must do it. Then again, after the fact, he'll have a lot of excuses on why he couldn't do these things.

The CAN'T do Presidency.

I think we can get jobs back. I think a lot bad guys in Afghanistan can be killed with reduced US casualties. I think the oil spill can be dealt with effectively and immediately. I think the US can be the economic engine of the world. I want a can do presidency.

Monday, June 28, 2010

Brewer to Obama: Warning Signs Are Not Enough


The sign says:

Danger-Public Warning Travel Not Recommended
*Active Drug and Smuggling Area
*Visitors May Encounter Armed Criminals and Smuggling Vehicles Traveling at High Rates of Speed.
*Stay Away From Trash Clothing Backpacks and Abandoned Vehicles
*If You See Suspicious Activity Do Not Confront! Move Away and Call 911
*BLM Encourages Visitors to Use Public Lands North of Interstate 8

Tuesday, June 15, 2010

What Problem? I Don't See No Sinkin' Problem. Jus' a Bunch of Redneck Racists

“I say this again as someone who has walked that border.” “I’ve ridden that border. I’ve flown it. I’ve driven it. I know that border I think as well as anyone, and I will tell you it is as secure now as it has ever been.” Janet Napolitano, Secretary of Department of Homeland Security (DHS). She has also said that the Obama administration has shown an “absolute laserlike focus on that border”.

Pinal County Sheriff Paul Babeu in this vid, saying they are out gunned. He's says they no longer have control of parts of their county. "We are outgunned, we are out manned and we don't have the resources here locally to fight this."



This sign is about 80 miles from the US/Mexico border. 80 miles! inside the US!

The sign says:
Danger-Public Warning Travel Not Recommended
*Active Drug and Smuggling Area
*Visitors May Encounter Armed Criminals and Smuggling Vehicles Traveling at High Rates of Speed.
*Stay Away From Trash Clothing Backpacks and Abandoned Vehicles
*If You See Suspicious Activity Do Not Confront! Move Away and Call 911
*BLM Encourages Visitors to Use Public Lands North of Interstate 8


South of I-8, BLM land, Federal Land, has been ceded by the US Government to a foreign paramilitary force that engages in drug smuggling, rape, murder, and kidnapping. US law enforcement officers are being gunned down. US citizens don't go into an area that was once popular for hikes and picnics with the family.

Yet our president and his Dept of Homeland Security see no threat to the safety of the citizens of Arizona. The Democrat Party sees no threat to Arizona. The Jurassic Press sees no threat to Arizona. None of them believe in the rule of law. They all advocate for illegal immigration and amnesty for criminals that are in this country illegally. This is going on, and when they try to protect themselves, to do the job the Federal Gov is required by law to do, they are call fascists and racists.

HEY! ENFORCE THE DAMN LAW!!!

Follow this and other border stories at Borderland Beat.
and the Blog Mexico's Drug War

Three Immigration Stories

Hamas. Terror. Murder. Hate. Islamofacism. Antisemitism. The founder of Hamas, Hassan Yousef, has a son named Mosab Hassan Yousef, who has written a memoir, "Son of Hamas". Horrified by the death and murder of innocents, he turned against Hamas and his father. He became a spy for the Israelis because he wanted to save lives. Apparently his information has saved a lot of lives. That being done, he's converted to Christianity and has moved to the US. Being here he's provided even more information to the Dept of Homeland Security. Having done that, he's asked for political asylum. DHS is being really slow responding and it's not certain that this brave immigrant will be given his wish.

Keeping that story in mind, brave immigrant trying to do things legally, this story involves Massachusetts state representative Mike Moran. Moran is a supporter of illegal immigration and open borders. He supports sanctuary states (Mass is one) and cities. My view is that anyone that supports this idea does not support the rule of law. Moran was at a stoplight and was rear-ended by a drunk illegal immigrant doing 60. He had no license and his alcohol level was three times the legal limit. The drunk criminal that almost killed someone said that there's nothing anyone could do to him. He laughed about it. The almost equally reprehensible Moran: "I have been and will continue to be pro-immigrant and in some cases even pro-illegal-immigrant. It would be politically expedient for me at this point in time to change that. That should...tell you that even after being hit by one I will continue to advocate for immigrants and their rights as citizens in this country." Aren't officials sworn into office sworn to uphold the law? When did people here illegally get the rights of citizens? Or even why may be a better question.

Arizona Gov Jan Brewer is asking for the resignation of the State Attorney General, and if she doesn't get it, will begin legal proceedings to have him removed from office. The guy has spoken against the bill passed by the state legislature, and has lied about it contents. He's the chief law officer of the state. He too is sworn to uphold the law. From the letter asking for the resignation:
"...your decision to file this motion without my approval amounts to an unconstitutional usurpation of my authority and a violation of state law as set forth in Section 8 of House Bill 2162. ... I respectfully request that you step aside so my legal team can set forth the best defense possible in the immigration lawsuits currently before the federal district court. If you do not withdraw your motion to intervene in Friendly House, I will pursue all legal remedies available to me to have you removed as counsel for the State of Arizona to ensure the State a true and proper defense. "
Full letter here.

Color me crazy, but I really do think the rule of law is a good thing, and that protecting brave people obeying the law is a good thing; that ignoring laws and giving a pass to criminals is a bad thing.

Monday, June 14, 2010

Just Because You Do Something Illegal Doesn't Make You a Criminal!



“You can’t equate criminals with undocumented workers." Arizona immigration law is not “going to stop criminals.”

Goes back to the 1920's signs outside boarding houses in Hollywood, "No Dogs or Actors Allowed". Hey entertainers, you're just performers. Shut up and sing. Or act. Or rollover. Or play dead, which would be best.

Thursday, May 27, 2010

More Arizona and Illegal Immigration-A Picture is Worth...

The Beautiful Sonoran Desert being cared for by illegal aliens, respecting our country and environment. This is on an 'illegal super - highway' from Mexico to the USA (Tucson) used by human smugglers. This area is located in a wash, approximately 1.5 miles long, just south of Tucson, Arizona. It is estimated over 5,000 discarded backpacks are in this wash. Countless water containers, food wrappers, clothing, feces, including thousands of soiled baby diapers. These people are coming soon to a city near you.






After they get to your city, here's how they act. These are from a pro-Mexico, anti-American rally at Montebello High School in California. Where are the teachers and school administrators? They allowed these anti-American people to put a foreign flag above the Stars and Stripes? Meanwhile in another high school across the country, American citizens that are high school students got sent home for wearing US patriotic clothing.



Friday, May 21, 2010

We Don't Need To Enforce No Stinkin' Laws Unless We Feel Like It

Mission statement from the ICE website: "U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Formed in 2003 as part of the federal government's response to the 9/11 attacks, ICE's mission is to protect the security of the American people and homeland by vigilantly enforcing the nation's immigration and customs laws."

Today, John Morton, assistant secretary of homeland security for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, said: "I don't think the Arizona law, or laws like it, are the solution." He said that the law is "not good government".

This guy is the top cop, the honcho law enforcement officer, saying he's not going to carry out the mission of ICE or enforce immigration law. Reminder: the Arizona immigration law, SB 1070, only mirrors Federal immigration laws that have existed since the 1940's.

Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-AL: "If he feels he cannot enforce the law, he shouldn't have the job." "That makes him, in my view, not fulfilling the responsibilities of his office." Exactly.

We should hardly be surprised that a member of pro-illegal immigration, pro open border, pro amnesty Democrat party, is not going enforce the law. After all, this guy's boss, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano, said there's no problem in Arizona, everything is hunky dory. Earlier blog here about the problems Arizona is having (kidnapping, murder, rape, drugs, etc. on a massive destructive scale) and Napolitano's severe mental condition of denial or flat out lying.

Here's another thing about what Obama, Napalitano, an undersecretary of state (can't remember his name right now), US Attorney General Eric Holder, the last three admitting they have not read SB 1070 (a whole 16 pages long!), saying state cops will be running around, racial profiling, locking people up, and doing whatever else these knuckleheads think cops do. Like cops are a bunch of racists that have nothing better to do than harass non-white people. That's a pretty demeaning representation of officers of the law.

These Statists do not believe in the rule of law, they believe in the rule of man, but only if they are the ones in charge. So of course this Morton character can refuse to enforce the law, and get a pass by Dems and their lap dinosaurs in the Jurassic Press.

Thursday, May 20, 2010

Man Invited to Dinner Insults Host's Family, Host Agrees With Him

Calderone, President of corrupt Mexico that beats, murders, robs, tortures, imprisons and expels people that come into that country illegally, has it's citizens come across our border that in turn kidnaps, rapes, robs and murders American citizens, runs drugs and guns, then comes to this country and insults our citizens. Our president agrees with Calderone's insults, and the Dems gave him a standing O. Calderone owes the citizens of this country an apology, and should not be allowed back in the US until he does so. Obama owes the American people an apology for allowing a foreigner, guest to this country, to say such vile lies about America and its people, and agreeing. Calderone said these things at a press conference yesterday, and repeated them before Congress today, before what are supposed to be representatives of the American people. Every Democrat that stood and cheered this political attack on the citizens of America should be censured.

Mexico gets $millions from American tax revenues in the form of foreign aid, makes $millions from sales to the US, makes $millions from money made in America by Mexican citizens working here that send money back. About 1 in 7 of Mexico's citizens leave that horrid corrupt murderous country and comes to the US. That's nearly 10% of their population! Mexico would be in even worse shape if it weren't for the United States. The president of Mexico should be thanking the American people. He should be beefing up his military on the border to help protect American citizens living there. He should be cleaning up his government and applying economic principals that make his country worth living in, to employ his own citizens. I'm so disgusted with Obama and the rest of his Statist bunch, and President Calderone, that I could just scream.

Calderon's speech. Notice all the Dems give a standing O when he insults the state of Arizona. I'm pleased that no Republicans applauded; even the RINO's! The rest of the stuff about wanting to improve his country and work with the US to solve the problem is a flat out lie. He, like Obama and the Dems, want open borders and amnesty to all the Mexicans living here illegally. That's what they all mean when they say "comprehensive immigration reform".


Here's the correct response.

Wednesday, May 19, 2010

Dems and Straight Talk Campaign for 2010

Looking at how the Dems are activating their policies, wouldn't be great if they campaigned on what they were doing; not doing and saying they aren't doing it? I know, a bit convoluted, but you'll get the drift here in a minute.

They way they have attacked Arizona, trying to destroy and impoverish American citizens that live there, advocating for the violation of immigration law, and being pro illegal immigration. Here's what they should be saying during their campaign: We advocate for the repeal of existing Federal immigration law. We advocate for open borders so there won't be any illegal immigration. We think anyone that came to this country illegally be given citizenship and registered as a Democrat immediately.

Dems were and are for, TARP, the Bailout, stimulus package, largess to Goldman Sachs and hiring their execs into positions of gov't power, the buying of private companies with printed money and (not yet received) taxes. The US has the highest (maybe second highest) Corporate tax rate in the world. They should be saying in next election: We believe in a weak private sector controlled by government, and all corporate profits should go to the government.

Taxes go up for the half of the country that pay taxes for the non-producing half every time Democrats are in power. The campaign: The money you make belongs to the government, and we'll decide how much of it you get to keep. We have to keep our constituents housed and fed.

Dems are against drilling for oil, oil exploration, coal power, nuclear power, building refineries. They should run on: We know alternative energy sources are really expensive and inefficient, but we are stopping all production of traditional energy sources. Only Venezuela, Vietnam, China and Cuba will be allowed to drill in the Gulf of Mexico. We will agree to pay whatever price they set. GE will be the sole provider of Green Energy and Energy products and services.

Dems have been criticizing Israel and giving a pass to Iran's nuclear armament programs, and not really blaming Hamas, PLO and those guys for much of anything. Dems should just campaign on: We support Terrorist States, and do not support democratic states in the Middle East. We do not support Israel defending itself, and will require they disarm. They are the true threat to Middle East peace.

Dems are for the Fairness Doctrine, and their Supreme Court nominee doesn't think the Constitution allows free speech (really, it's in a published paper she wrote). The Fairness Doctrine is about killing conservative media outlets, and anti-free speech Kagan they wholehearted support. They should campaign: We advocate for an amendment to the Constitution enumerating powers to the government to limit free speech.

Dems passed health care. Honest people, ones that have read the bill, know that it removes all private/personal choice regarding health issues from people. They should campaign: Gov't medical care is the best way, that politicians and government workers know best what medical issues are most important, and how to deal with them. Abortion should be government funded because it is a health issue.

These and a few others, campaign on them, make them a part of the Party Platform, and Dems will absolutely be swept into power unopposed. They're already doing these things, they should just say this is what they're doing. Come on now. Be honest. It's good for you.

21st Century Mindless Man

Two views of nations, immigration and borders, offered by two presidents, each at the beginning of their perspective century's.

In a letter just before he died dated in 1919:
"In the first place we should insist that if the immigrant who comes here in good faith becomes an American and assimilates himself to us, he shall be treated on an exact equality with everyone else, for it is an outrage to discriminate against any such man because of creed, or birthplace, or origin. But this is predicated upon the man's becoming in very fact an American, and nothing but an American...

There can be no divided allegiance here. Any man who says he is an American, but something else also, isn't an American at all. We have room for but one flag, the American flag, and this excludes the red flag, which symbolizes all wars against liberty and civilization, just as much as it excludes any foreign flag of a nation to which we are hostile...We have room for but one language here, and that is the English language...and we have room for but one sole loyalty and that is a loyalty to the American people."

--Theodore Roosevelt, 1919


Barak Obama, today: "We are Not Defined by Our Borders"

Barry Sotero, ummm, I mean Barak Obama, is a citizen of the world and doesn't believe in borders. Except maybe the borders of any property he owns.

During this ceremony El Presidente Calderone insulted the citizens of the US, especially the citizens of Arizona for being racists and whatever the Statist talking points are. Our president agrees with him. Of course there are thousands of people in Mexico that have been beaten, robbed, tortured and thrown in prison to rot for violating their immigration laws. If you're lucky when you're caught without papers coming up across the southern border of corrupt drug cartel governed Mexico, you may only be beaten and robbed by the Federales before being tossed back across the border.

Love this idea: Reciprocal immigration laws. If you come to the US, you have to do so applying the same laws as your country of origin. If you're a Mexican here illegally, our cops can throw you in jail without due process, lawyers, notification of anyone, etc. Just for example.

Friday, May 14, 2010

Illegal Immigration in Perspective

If you cross the North Korean border illegally you get 12 years hard labor.

If you cross the Iranian border illegally you are detained indefinitely.

If you cross the Afghan border illegally, you get shot.

If you cross the Saudi Arabian border illegally you will be jailed.

If you cross the Chinese border illegally you may never be heard from again.

If you cross the Venezuelan border illegally you will be branded a spy and your fate will be sealed.

If you cross the Cuban border illegally you will be thrown into political prison to rot.

If you cross the U.S. border illegally you get:

a job,
a drivers license,
social security card,
welfare,
food stamps,
credit cards,
subsidized rent or a loan to buy a house,
free education,
free health care,
a lobbyist in washington
billions of dollars worth of public documents printed in your language
the right to carry your country's flag while you protest that you don't get enough respect
and, in many instances, you can vote.