Another Federal Government Attack on Christianity

It's been a tradition as long as this country has existed, and that's placing crosses to commemorate the dead. It's been part of the ACLU,  neo-atheists and the Federal Government to expunge Christianity from the nation for decades. The most recent attack has been on crosses placed in Utah to commemorate Highway Patrolmen killed in the line of duty.

Statist judges have decided that these crosses are unconstitutional. I've looked over the US Constitution a lot, and I don't see any mention of crosses. Don't see anything in there about religion, except the government can't make you pray and go to religious services of their choosing.

The alleged judges from Denver's 10th US Circuit Court of Appeals said it's in there, that the crosses were endorsing Christianity. These crosses, 12 foot high, 6 foot cross bar, were paid for privately by citizens with the agreement of the families of the fallen officers. A short biography of an officer was on each cross.

When you see a cross on the highway, what first comes to mind? Someone who has died or Christ resurrected? The alleged judges said that any "reasonable observer" would conclude the state of Utah and the Utah Highway Patrol were endorsing Christianity. They only think that because they are secularist anti-Christian bigots. It took 38 pages of opinion to say they will not tolerate anything that reminds them, not anyone else, of Christianity, and to insult the law enforcement community.

The suit was brought the American Atheists Inc. Atheism has been ruled by the Supreme Court to be a religion, so these three alleged judges have chosen one religion over another, and used the force of law to implement the Atheists' belief.

Supported by Statist Secular alleged judges.

This is an insult to the fallen patrolmen, their families and Christianity.

This is an endorsement of Secularism, Statism, and Atheism by the Federal Government.