May each of you have the heart to conceive, the understanding to direct, and the hand to execute works that will leave the world a little better for your having been here. -- Ronald Reagan

Showing posts with label new york times. Show all posts
Showing posts with label new york times. Show all posts

Sunday, February 8, 2015

White Leftist NYC Mayor, Crime, Cops and Lies

New York City Mayor, Bill De Blasio, is a cop hater and racist. The racist part is the White Leftist Guilt Trip variety. ‘I’m white but down with the struggle’. He’s gotten officers assassinated, crime increased, more minorities being raped and murdered, with drug trafficking up in those neighborhoods with his attitude and policies.

The two officers that were assassinated, Rafael Ramos and Wenjian Liu, is a direct result of De Blasio’s speaking out against the NYPD. He is against the stop-frisk-question policy that has in fact reduced crime. He’s repeatedly said police officers are the biggest threat to black men. He said nothing about demonstrations chanting “What do we want? Dead cops!” Then there was the Eric Garner taken down for refusing arrest. He was obese, had several medical issues, including asthma, the latter the primary cause of his death. There was never a choke hold. Yet another Jurassic Press lie.

Here’s some numbers, not reported by alleged journalists, and ignored or maybe not known (but should be) by the Leftist Mayor De Blasio. The use of force in arrests means the officer touched the suspect, and the first half of 2014 had that reported in 0.6% of arrests. Reading the NY Times and others, one would think that loose cigarette sales arrests (what Garner was being arrested for) was a huge deal, and use of force was a regular thing. In that same time period, 2014, there were no, zero, use of force arrests for loose cigarette sales.

There was a lot of reporting of reduced arrests and policing of minority areas. Arrests were high, bad guys getting busted because of the stop and frisk program. Officers pretty much quit doing that, since to continue opened them up to charges of racist policing. This was a 95% drop in misdemeanor and traffic violation summonses. That would be exactly what De Blasio wanted, his contention being that kind of policing is racist. That would be a civil rights violation.

What happened with that kind of change in policing? When crime in minority areas skyrocketed? Civil rights of minorities were being violated because of non-enforcement of the law. Say what? If you enforce the law it’s a civil rights violation, and if you don’t enforce the law, it’s a civil rights violation. Of course the alleged “press” reported the enforcement drawdown was only in minority areas. Absolutely false. It was across the board, all precincts and neighborhoods.

Threat assessment? Bad guys in NYC were involved in 1,103 shootings, with 1,299 victims in 2013. NYPD shot 17 people in 2013, dispatched 80,000 times to weapons involved incidents, and had 30,000 of those ending in arrests. So where’s the threat coming from? The racist part? Whites were 5% of suspects shot by police; they committed 2% of weapons crimes. Blacks were 75% of criminal shooters and 79% of police shootings. NYPD have brought down NYC homicide rate 80% in the last 15 to 20 years. But doing so is racist?

Have shootings and crime gone up or down under De Blasio’s anti cop White Leftist racist policies and ideology? Measured against the previous year, NYC shootings were up 82% the week of Jan 5 through 11 of 2015 (over same week previous year). The month before shootings were up 12% over the previous year.

Who are the victims of shootings? Mostly minorities because the ideologically driven, cop hating mayor, forcing the police to withdraw protection from high crime areas.

As for distain the police department has for De Blasio, he was counting on the Asians, Blacks, Mexicans on the force to support him in his Leftist racist policies, and was surprised when all of the police at the funeral for the two assassinated officers turned their backs to him. (The NY Times and other alleged “news” outlets reported only a few, turned their back. All of them did. There may be a few that didn’t but I didn’t see any.) Police put their careers, who they are and what they do, before racial politics. Good for them. 


Tuesday, February 23, 2010

Two Faced Libs

How Conservatives act and the response, and how Leftists act and the response is the most amazing thing.

Sarah Palin...Christian, Conservative, married to childhood sweetheart (manly macho huntin', fishin', works outdoors, does serious outdoor sports), takes care of her kids and maintained a job that she excelled at. Response: Stupid hick woman, deserving of mockery.
John Edwards... Liar, offered bribes (hush money to extramarital lover, probably with campaign money), affair while wife fighting cancer, love child from extramarital affair, built a mansion while telling the rest of us to sacrifice with higher taxes and a lower standard of living. Press covered up the affair until it no longer could, and gave him a pass on everything.

NY Times releases US government secrets during Bush administration. During Obama administration, are we hearing anything? What, the government is all the sudden doing everything right and above board?

Bush's war on terror had everything labeled as horrifying. Renditions, Gitmo, waterboarding, torture...whatever could be found. Gitmo is still open. Anything? Nope. I'd say Bush lied! about closing it. Ooooops, wrong guy. Well, we do have this president still blaming Bush, so that gets reported. How about assassinations? Predator drones are killing bad guys. Cindy Sheehan is really pissed off about this! Why isn't she getting massive coverage like she did during the Bush administration? Is she camped out at the personal residence of Obama? Where is the Obama's home anyway? Is it still that questionably financed one in Chicago?

For a year, Dems controlled the Senate, controlled the Executive Branch, controlled the House of Representatives, and the Jurassic Press was ecstatic. Now, after a year of failed economic policies, bailing out corporations that had paid off Obama's political party, failed foreign policy (the bad guys are even acting out worse)...guess what? The Dems and their lap dinosaurs of the Jurassic Press are no longer ecstatic, and all these bad things happened because of the powerless, out of power, Republicans. They don't have the votes to do squat. The Dems could pass anything they want.But...it's the Republicans fault we're in this mess!

Good grief.

For the full analysis of this massive Leftist hypocrisy, Victor Davis Hansen's article here.

Tuesday, January 26, 2010

MSM Worships, You Don't Get to Decide VIII

This past Friday there was a march in DC, which is the longest consecutive running one, and is attended by thousands yearly. Most people aren't aware of it because it's an anti-abortion march. ABC, CBS, NBC and AP did not cover it...at all. Usually the Jurassic Press at least mocks, demeans and insults protesters that don't fit their ideological views. The best recent example is the Tea Party Movement. Ten of thousands have protested in DC on several occasions and were insulted and called names, and millions nationwide have protested, and were insulted and called names.

The same day the NY Times, alleged 'news' paper, had a 780 page article on four protesters for illegal immigrants (read 'undocumented Democrat voters') that did a march from Miami to DC. NPR had two days of an interview with the successor to Tiller the baby killer, Leroy Carhart. Tiller, if you remember, provided abortions of babies up to full term. Cathart: "I mean, it's just extremism, it's religious terrorism." He's referring of course to people that have a problem with abortion on demand. Cathart reflects perfectly the view of the Jurassic Press.

Monday, September 29, 2008

Geraldine Ferraro and the NYTimes 1984

Dateline, New York Times, July 3, 1984: "Where is it written that only senators are qualified to become President?...Or where is it written that mere representatives aren't qualified, like Geraldine Ferraro of Queens?...Where is it written that governors and mayors, like Dianne Feinstein of San Francisco, are too local, too provincial?...Presidential candidates have always chosen their running mates for reasons of practical demography, not idealized democracy.... What a splendid system, we say to ourselves, that takes little-known men, tests them in high office and permits them to grow into statesmen.... Why shouldn't a little-known woman have the same opportunity to grow?"