May each of you have the heart to conceive, the understanding to direct, and the hand to execute works that will leave the world a little better for your having been here. -- Ronald Reagan

Showing posts with label 1964 Civil Rights Act. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 1964 Civil Rights Act. Show all posts

Sunday, November 18, 2012

Spielberg's "Lincoln" Good Movie Followed by Big Lie


Yesterday I saw Spielberg's "Lincoln" which made the passage of the 13th Amendment about as interesting as possible. The acting was brilliant.  Reviewers and responders on blogs got all caught up in the portrayal of Lincoln and the tenor voice, and with historical minutiae. It's not a documentary; good grief. Of course there are going to be artistic liberties taken. Surprisingly, Spielberg, screenwriter Tony Kushner, and Daniel Day Lewis, all Statist, Leftist Radicals, didn't rewrite history and avoided the standard attacks on Republicans. Actually it was a pretty good sketch of the events getting the anti-slavery amendment passed, and correctly portrayed the Democrats as the pro-slavery Party.

The meme is that it's the Republican Party that's racist and segregationist. The opposite has always been the case. Spielberg has been saying in interviews that Dems and Republicans "have traded political places over the last 150 years".  A blatant lie.  

The Dems were the ones that fought against civil rights legislation in the mid twentieth century, were the supporters and members of the KKK and all the rest of the horrible treatment of Blacks in this country. It's the Democrats that have impoverished and enslaved Blacks in the Urban Plantation in the twentieth century, and continue to do so. Black unemployment is in the high teens, and going up under a Black Democrat president.

Here is the history of the Racist Democrat Party vs the Republican Party. By the way, most Blacks were members of the Republican Party from the end of the Civil War into the early 20th century. Then the Dems did then, what they do now, offered a lot of free stuff. No such thing as free stuff, but people vote for their own oppression on the promise of free stuff.    

The Democrats:
Democrats fought to expand slavery while Republicans fought to end it.
Democrats passed those discriminatory Black Codes and Jim Crow laws.
Democrats supported and passed the Missouri Compromise to protect slavery and the Kansas Nebraska Act to expand slavery.

Democrats supported and backed the Dred Scott Decision.

Democrats opposed educating blacks and murdered our teachers.

Democrats fought against anti-lynching laws.

Democrat Senator Robert Byrd of West Virginia, is well known for having been a “Kleagle” in the Ku Klux Klan. Byrd filibustered the Civil Rights Act of 1964 for 14 straight hours to keep it from passage.

Democrats passed the Repeal Act of 1894 that overturned civil right laws enacted by Republicans.

Democrats declared that they would rather vote for a “yellow dog” than vote for a Republican, because the Republican Party was known as the party for blacks.

Democrat President Woodrow Wilson, reintroduced segregation throughout the federal government immediately upon taking office in 1913.

Democrat President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s first appointment to the Supreme Court was a life member of the Ku Klux Klan, Sen. Hugo Black, Democrat of Alabama.

Democrat President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s choice for vice president in 1944 was Harry Truman, who had joined the Ku Klux Klan in Kansas City in 1922.

Democrat President Franklin D. Roosevelt resisted Republican efforts to pass a federal law against lynching.

Democrat President Franklin D. Roosevelt opposed integration of the armed forces.

Democrat Senators Sam Ervin, Albert Gore, Sr. and Robert Byrd were the chief opponents of the 1964 Civil Rights Act.

Democrats supported and backed Judge John Ferguson in the case of Plessy v Ferguson.

Democrats supported the School Board of Topeka Kansas in the case of Brown v The Board of Education of Topeka Kansas.

Democrat public safety commissioner Eugene “Bull” Connor, in Birmingham, Ala., unleashed vicious dogs and turned fire hoses on black civil rights demonstrators.

Democrats were who Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. and the other protesters were fighting.

Democrat Georgia Governor Lester Maddox “brandished an ax hammer to prevent blacks from patronizing his restaurant.

Democrat Governor George Wallace stood in front of the Alabama schoolhouse in 1963, declaring there would be segregation forever.

Democrat Arkansas Governor Faubus tried to prevent desegregation of Little Rock public schools.

Democrat Senator John F. Kennedy voted against the 1957 Civil rights Act.

Democrat President John F. Kennedy opposed the 1963 March on Washington by Dr. King.

Democrat President John F. Kennedy, had Dr. King wiretapped and investigated by the FBI.

Democrat President Bill Clinton’s mentor was U.S. Senator J. William Fulbright, an Arkansas Democrat and a supporter of racial segregation.

Democrat President Bill Clinton interned for J. William Fulbright in 1966-67.

Democrat Senator J. William Fulbright signed the Southern Manifesto opposing the Supreme Court’s 1954 Brown vs. Board of Education decision.

Democrat Senator J. William Fulbright joined with the Dixiecrats in filibustering the Civil Rights Acts of 1957 and 1964.

Democrat Senator J. William Fulbright voted against the 1965 Voting Rights Act.

Southern Democrats opposed desegregation and integration.

Democrats opposed:

1.The Emancipation Proclamation
2.The 13th Amendment
3.The 14th Amendment
4.The 15th Amendment
5.The Reconstruction Act of 1867
6.The Civil Rights of 1866
7.The Enforcement Act of 1870
8.The Forced Act of 1871
9.The Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871
10.The Civil Rights Act of 1875
11.The Freeman Bureau
12.The Civil Rights Act of 1957
13.The Civil Rights Act of 1960
14.The United State Civil Rights Commission


Republicans gave strong bi-partisan support and sponsorship for the following
legislation:

1.The Civil Rights Act of 1964
2.The Voting Rights Act of 1965
3.The 1968 Civil Rights Acts
4.The Equal Opportunity Act of 1972
5.Goals and Timetables for Affirmative Action Programs
6.Comprehensive Employment Training Act of 1973
7.Voting Rights Act of Amendment of 1982
8.Civil Rights Act of 1983
9.Federal Contract Compliance and Workforce Development Act of 1988

The Republicans:
Republicans enacted civil rights laws in the 1950’s and 1960’s, over the objection of Democrats.
Republicans founded the HBCU’s (Historical Black College’s and Universities) and started the NAACP to counter the racist practices of the Democrats.
Republicans pushed through much of the ground-breaking civil rights legislation in Congress.
Republicans fought slavery and amended the Constitution to grant blacks freedom, citizenship and the right to vote.

Republicans pushed through much of the groundbreaking civil rights legislation from the 1860s through the 1960s.

Republican President Dwight Eisenhower sent troops into the South to desegregate the schools.

Republican President Eisenhower appointed Chief Justice Earl Warren to the Supreme Court, which resulted in the 1954 Brown vs. Board of Education decision.

Republican Senator Everett Dirksen from Illinois, not Democrat President Lyndon Johnson, was the one who pushed through the civil rights laws of the 1960’s.

Republican Senator Everett Dirksen from Illinois wrote the language for the 1965 Voting Rights Act.

Republican Senator Everett Dirksen from Illinois also crafted the language for the Civil Rights Act of 1968 which prohibited discrimination in housing.

Republican and black American, A. Phillip Randolph, organized the 1963 March by Dr. King on Washington.

The 1964 Civil Rights Act Roll Call Vote: In the House, only 64 percent of the Democrats (153 yes, 91 no), but 80 percent of the Republicans (136 yes, 35 no), voted for it. In the Senate, while only 68 percent of the Democrats endorsed the bill (46 yes, 21 no), 82 percent of the Republicans voted to enact it (27 yes, 6 no).

Thaddeus Stevens, a Radical Republican that introduced legislation to give African Americans the so-called 40 acres and a mule and Democrats overwhelmingly voted against the bill.

During the Senate debates on the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871, it was revealed that members of the Democratic Party formed many terrorist organizations like the Ku Klux Klan to murder and intimidate African Americans voters. The Ku Klux Klan Act was a bill introduced by a Republican Congress to stop Klan Activities.

History reveals that Democrats lynched, burned, mutilated and murdered thousands of blacks and completely destroyed entire towns and communities occupied by middle class Blacks, including Rosewood, Florida, the Greenwood District in Tulsa Oklahoma, and Wilmington, North Carolina to name a few.

History reveals that it was Abolitionists and Radical Republicans such as Henry L. Morehouse and General Oliver Howard that started many of the traditional Black colleges, while Democrats fought to keep them closed. Many of our traditional Black colleges are named after white Republicans.

After exclusively giving the Democrats their votes for the past 25 years, the average African American cannot point to one piece of civil rights legislation sponsored solely by the Democratic Party that was specifically designed to eradicate the unique problems that African Americans face today.

As of 2004, the Democrat Party (the oldest political party in America) had never elected a black man to the United States Senate, while the Republicans had elected three.



Sunday, November 27, 2011

Progressivism: A Living Oxymoron, Liberty Through the Oppression of the State

In my Marxist days, I believed the best, if not the only, way to get the poor and sick taken care of was to have the government in charge of it. To get that done money had to be taken from rich folks to pay for taking care of the sick, and the poor were poor through no fault of their own, it was rich people’s fault. I was often poor, even homeless a couple times. Thing was, I found work, sometimes two jobs, and worked my way out of it. That I was poor was because of my own decisions. I returned to the Church and Christianity, and noted that faith tradition puts on each of us to help and heal the sick and help the poor, and with God’s guidance, do well for ourselves, usually by being in service to others. It’s not government’s responsibility; it’s mine and yours, personally.

If we’re the moral and ethical creatures we claim to be, then we take action on that, not get the political class to shake down producers in the name of the less fortunate. How did it come to be so many in a democracy give up personal responsibility for self and service and pass this ethical imperative to the State? That shift results in racism and oppression, anti-Semitism, anti-Christian bigotry, and yet nearly half our population mistakenly believes it’s Liberty that leads to those horrible things.

At the beginning of the 20th century there were a bunch of social scientists that came out of European economic thinking, mostly German, which stated economics should be, at its base, ethical. The leading thinker who was most influential in moving this notion forward was Richard Ely. His influence, (who knew?) served as the foundation of the New Deal, which in turn became the foundation for turning the US into a socialist state. All this was the “Progressive” Movement. Ely said, “To the demands of ethics, it is felt, should the entire economic life be made subservient.” He talked about this being the “ethical ideal” of social ethics. The “ethical ideal” he said “animates the new political economy”. It’s “the most perfect development of all human faculties in each individual, which can be attained.” From this he contended the government would foster, create and increase in people more love, knowledge, compassion and whatever else he and his fellow progressives decided would make better human beings.

This takes away individual freedom, which he pronounced a “negative freedom”, and needs to be replaced by “true liberty” which prompts us to become the most we can be by being forced to be in the service of others. Jesus taught us that service is the highest expression of our humanity, and those that willingly serve were “the greatest among you”. Ely and his fellow progressives did not, and progressives now (aka Democrats and other Leftists) do not believe people capable of that, so must be compelled by the State to “serve” others. A result of that is Progressives think taking care of others is best done by becoming a member of the political class, not going out and actually personally caring for others.

When mere people are left to their own devices, there’s a cycle of lots of help and service, down to less, up to more. Things run in cycles. Things get better, things get worse and so it continues; Natural Law. Progressives contend this isn’t a good thing, and by them controlling everyone, making them be of “service”, then that natural law can be stopped, and only then can things get “progressively” better in a linear manner.
People need, of course, to be trained on how to become servants of the State, often referred to as “the masses” (hate that term, but it makes Leftists, Dems and progressives easily identifiable) before they are granted the right to be contributors to the social good. One group especially needing extra guidance was and is our Black brothers and sisters. Some races needed extra guidance, and rejected the idea of the Founding Fathers that all men are created equal. Ely again: “For a long time in this country we were inclined to regard men as substantially equal, and to suppose that all could live under the same economic and political institutions. It now becomes plain that this is a theory which works disaster, and is, indeed, cruel to those who are in the lower stages, resulting in their exploitation and degradation.”  Of course non-whites need not apply for personal Liberty. White people must educate them how to be free.

The colonial occupation or the imperialism of the late 18th and early 20th century American foreign policy was a result of this notion than lesser races needed help from those more enlightened. Albert Beveridge, a progressive leader of the early 20th century, on the idea America should withdraw from the Philippines: “Self-government is a method of liberty — the highest, simplest, best — but it is acquired only after centuries of study and struggle and experiment and instruction and all the elements of the progress of man. Self-government is no base and common thing to be bestowed on the merely audacious. It is the degree which crowns the graduate of liberty, not the name of liberty’s infant class, who have not yet mastered the alphabet of freedom. Savage blood, Oriental blood, Malay blood, Spanish example — are these the elements of self-government?”

Back in the US, Progressives were against the 15th amendment which denied government, state, local or federal, to deny the right of citizens to vote based on “race, color, or previous condition of servitude”. Another Progressive leader at the time, John R Commons, on the notion that everyone should have a right to vote: “…after many thousand years of savagery and two centuries of slavery, was suddenly let loose into the liberty of citizenship and the electoral suffrage. The world never before had seen such a triumph of dogmatism and partisanship. It was dogmatism, because a theory of abstract equality and inalienable rights of man took the place of education and the slow evolution of moral character.” 

These “progressives” actually advocated putting African Americans in labor camps and while their parents were “laboring” put their children in “progressive" schools to learn how to be free. As Blacks became more educated they could be released from the labor camps, after passing a “literacy test”. Does that sound familiar? That idea was used by Democrats in the South well into the 20th century to oppress the Black vote. Here’s the justification for labor camps, written by another “progressive” leader of the time, Charlotte Perkins Gilman: “…Given: in the same country, Race A, progressed in social evolution, say, to Status 10; and Race B, progressed in social evolution, say, to Status 4. . . . Given: that Race B, in its present condition, does not develop fast enough to suit Race A. Question: How can Race A best and most quickly promote the development of Race B?”

Fredrick Douglas protested this, saying it was re-enslaving Blacks. Gilman’s response that it isn’t enslavement: “It is no dishonor but an honorable employment from the first, and the rapid means of advancement. . . . All should belong to it — all, that is, below the grade of efficiency which needs no care. For the children — this is the vital base of the matter — a system of education, the best we have, should guarantee the fullest development possible to each; from the carefully appointed nursery and kindergarten up to the trade school fitting the boy or girl for life; or, if special capacity be shown, for higher education.”

Setting Blacks in camps is segregation, promoted and practiced by Democrats well into the 20th century; segregated schools, restaurants, bathrooms, drinking fountains. Literacy tests. The idea Blacks were inferior, that not all men are created equal, is a Leftist, Progressive, idea, promoted and practiced by the Democrat Party. This idea lasted even into the 1960’s when a majority of Democrats voted against the Civil Rights and Voting Rights Bills. More on the Racism and violence of the Democrat Party here.

All the programs that have bankrupted this country morally, culturally, religiously, and economically can be laid at the feet of “Progressives”, Leftists, Socialists, and the Democrat Party. W.W. Willoughby, another shining light of this philosophy of oppression of the State being true freedom, on the attributes of the State: “…that which first impresses one . . . is its possession of omnipotent rulership over all matters that arise between itself and the individuals of which it is composed.”

“Omnipotent Rulership”. The Left, Democrats…they decide, not you, how you behave, what decisions you make in your life, who you care about, how you care about them, how your serve your fellow man or not, how much of your income you get to keep.

This is a summary of and my thoughts on an article by Tiffany Jones Miller, "Progressivism, Race, and the Training Wheels of Freedom"

Saturday, October 1, 2011

Those Violent Conservatives and Republicans: From Then to Now

The overwhelming Leftist propaganda of the Democrat Party and Jurassic Press astoundingly goes unchallenged by Conservatives and the Republican Party. The latter had best get it together and start a wall to wall truth campaign revealing, over and over, the violence and racism of Democrats. The unrelenting propaganda is the Left is peaceful, peace loving and tolerant. Actually they're the one's that are violent, racist and intolerant. 

First the notion of Dems supporting the Civil Rights Bills of the 1960’s, that it was the Republicans who were against it and stopped it. Actually the Dems filibustered it in the Senate. Names:   
- Hill and Sparkman of Alabama
- Fulbright and McClellan of Arkansas
- Holland and Smathers of Florida
- Russell and Talmadge of Georgia
- Ellender and Long of Louisiana
- Eastland and Stennis of Mississippi
- Ervin and Jordan of North Carolina
- Johnston and Thurmond of South Carolina
- Gore Sr. and Walters of Tennessee
- H. Byrd and Robertson of Virginia
- R. Byrd of West Virginia

Just look and them good ol’ Dem Southern Boys. 40% of the House Democrats voted against the Civil Rights Act, and 80% of Republicans voted for it. The Dems also filibustered a civil rights act in 1957 that was passed by Republicans and Republican President Eisenhower signed it.

The most powerful political leaders opposed to school integration were Orval Faubus, Democrat Governor of Arkansas, George Wallace, Democrat Governor of Alabama and Lester Maddox, Democrat Governor of Georgia. Faubus is the Democrat racist that used police to block a school to keep Black kids out. It was Republican President Eisenhower that forced Faubus’ hand and got the schools integrated.

Democrat Racist Hugo Black was appointed to the Supreme Court. His rise to judicial power was the result of defending Klansmen. Klansmen by the way beat up Republicans for not going along with their Racist terrorist ways. Dems understand terrorism from the inside, since the Klan was a Democrat terrorist group.

There was Senator Robert Byrd, D-WV, a Klan official. There was Senator Ernest Hollings, D-SC who was instrumental in the fight against integration.

It was the Republican Party that fought for and won the fight to free the slaves. In the 1920’s the Republican’s regularly had anti-lynching legislation opposed by Democrats.

Rhetorical question. How come when white Dems attack Black conservatives like Clarence Thomas, Thomas Sowell, Shelby Steele, or Ward Connerly they aren’t being attacked as racist?

On to violence, which Dems and the Jurassic Press keep reporting is the domain of Republicans, Conservatives, and TEA Party supporters.

The riots of the 1960’s, the Democratic Convention, the race riots. Think any of them were Republican or Conservatives?

Who is that takes to the streets and destroys $millions worth of property? Conservatives or Leftists? Former Sec of Defense Rumsfeld was doing a book signing in Boston a few days ago and was attacked. Group of people were calling him a war criminal, chanting, “Hey Rumsfeld you can’t hide. We charge you with genocide.” Can you guess if they were Conservatives or Leftists? Are you aware of any Conservatives attacking a Leftist at a book signing?

Groups of people regularly go to the homes of judges and politicians, protesting a decision, or to a politician that voted on something they didn’t like. Are these people Conservatives or Leftists? Aware of any Conservative groups going to the homes of Leftist judges or politicians and protesting?

There’s been a bunch of people on Wall Street this past week, recently visited by the fat communist filmmaker Michael Moore, that has made $millions being a capitalist. There have been some arrests; fighting with police ‘n stuff while claiming to be a peaceful protest. Just to make a point about the Jurassic Press here, a reporter for the Leftist NY Times and Politico (reportedly a freelance “journalist”), Natasha Lennard, got arrested too. She was protesting with this group against Wall Street and Capitalism while reporting on it. Wonder if there were Conservatives there? Communist and Racist and alleged professor of something, Cornell West, egged these protesters on calling for revolution. Not the kind brought about by voting either. Think any of those people are Conservatives or Republicans?

The occupation of the Wisconsin Capital building this past summer, which caused about $7 million in damages, was done by government employees because they were asked to pay a little more (still less than those of us in the private sector) for their own Healthcare and Retirement programs. Want to guess if the occupiers were Leftists or Conservatives?

Then in Seattle, 500 longshoremen stormed the docks beating up people and even taking hostages. An additional 1,000 longshoremen shut down other docks. The kerfuffle wasn’t because of an issue with management, but because another union was chosen to do the work on a new project. Think any of these guys are Republicans or Conservatives?

How about the violent rhetoric of our uber partisan president?
 “They Bring a Knife…We Bring a Gun”
 “Get in Their Faces!”
 “I don’t want to quell anger. I think people are right to be angry! I’m angry!”
 “Hit Back Twice As Hard”
 “We talk to these folks… so I know whose ass to kick.”
  …Republican victory would mean “hand to hand combat”
 “It’s time to Fight for it.”
 “Punish your enemies.”
 “I’m itching for a fight.”
He’s talking about people that don’t want him raising taxes and increasing the debt. He's talking about people that won’t vote for him, that don’t support him. Ever hear a Republican president talk this way? Could you imagine that above the fold howling condemnation?  This guy recently said of those opposing his demand for tax hikes, then “We’re gonna have problems”. Sounds like a threat to me. Could you imagine the howling of the Jurassic Press if a Republic president said he would punish those that oppose him?

I’ve chronicled, most especially since the Arizona shooting by an apolitical crazy man, all the violence of the Left, supported by the Democrat Party. Remember they immediately came out saying it was a result of violent Conservative, Republican and TEA Party rhetoric.  It’ll get worse too. Dems are facing a political loss next year that will dwarf what happened this past November. There will be more of the kind of thing like Racist and Communist Maxine Waters telling TEA Party members and supporters to go to hell. There’ll be more of union thugs like Hoffa that thundered, “Let’s take these sons a bitches out”, referring to TEA Party members and supporters, Conservatives and Republicans. Rhetorical content has much to do with the speaker; so when a union thug says….

Got to agree with Breitbart's response to these thugs:

http://youtu.be/6URpHh4iuJE

The Left is violent historically, The Bolshevik Revolution and how they stayed in power, and were supported by the American Left. The Maoist Revolution and how they stayed in power. The Nazi’s and how they stayed in power, and forget about even mentioning Nazi’s are “right wing”…they were a Socialist party. How Castro got and stayed in power. The American Left will get nosier and more violent, increasing all the way to the election. If the Whitehouse sees a Republican voted in expect the streets to erupt. There’s only half a dozen, if that, of Senate seats that need to be won for Republicans to control that chamber. The vitriolic rhetoric, hate speech and violence will get worse. It’ll be reported in the Jurassic Press that it’s the Republicans’ fault.

Republicans and Conservatives need to start now with a campaign, and repeat it ad nauseam, about the history of violence, bigotry, anti-Semitism, racism, hatred and intolerance of the Left, and how it’s being expressed in the here and now. It needs to be graphic with lots of pictures and Democrats saying racist and anti-Semitic things. They need to run ads over and over of the Democrat’s voting against Civil Rights and Integration. Unceasingly.