Al Gore's Hot Air Increases Global Warming Yet More

Are the uncivil racists of the Left ever going to stop yelling “racist” to everyone that opposes their failed socio-economic policies? Now the crazy Leftist thug Algore is likening people that question his unproven view of anthropomorphic caused global warming, I mean climate change, to racism. Really?

He’s comparing the Leftist movement to curb the American lifestyle to how they want us to live to the Civil Rights movement, so opposing him and his other environmental wacko’s is like being racist. He urges his followers to “win the conversation”. It’s hard to follow Algore’s ramblings, but he’s apparently talking about how the civil rights conversation was won by people saying, “There came a time when people said, 'Hey man, why do you talk that way? That's wrong, I don't go for that, so don't talk that way around me. I just don't believe that.'”  "That happened in millions of conversations, and slowly the conversation was won.” “And we still have racism, God knows, but it's so different now and so much better. And we have to win the conversation on climate.”

Of course he wants us to eat less meat in the cause of global warming, I mean climate change, and eat our peas (hat tip to Obama). He wants more organic farming. No doubt he has an expensive government program to facilitate that. Like Obama he’s against the use of coal, and we shouldn’t be using so much oil.

I wonder which of his mansions he flies to in his massive oil burning private jet after muttering such inanities. 

It's Bush's Fault the Gores Have Split Up!

The oil leak in the Gulf is being blamed on Bush and Cheney, out of power for a year and a half, and Cheney hasn't had anything to do with the oil industry for nearly a decade. The economic situation is blamed on Bush, by Obama, Dems, and slobbering sycophantic press, even though Bush has been out of power for so long. Actually the crybaby Dems and Obama are blaming every setback, challenge and disaster on Bush.

With all that, the lap dog dinosaurs of the Jurassic Press, are now blaming Bush for the breakup of the Gores. How is that? you ask.

In what passes for news, and this is the Evening News on CBS, Sally Quinn (Washington Post) and alleged reporter Sharyl Attkisson determined that if Bush had not stolen the electoral votes (remember Gore won the popular vote), then, by George! (sorry, couldn't help myself), all that strain and stress on the marriage wouldn't have happened, and the Gores would be living happily ever after.

Attkisson: “...it's been ten years since that oddly public passionate kiss at the Democratic convention. That was followed by Gore winning the popular vote for President but losing the electoral vote. Family friend Sally Quinn says that may have done the marriage irreparable harm.”

Quinn: “He obviously suffered a lot and still is suffering. He'll never get over that and neither will she.”

True to Democrat, Statist, immature thinking, everything is everybody else's fault. To quote Bart Simpson, titular leader of the Democrat Party, "I didn't do it!"

Al Gore Confronted on Climategate in Chicago (vid)

Behavior a little over the top, but I like it. Gore has been supporting this kind of behavior from the Left forever. To paraphrase fellow Leftist Jeremiah Wright, the chickens have come home to roost or some such thing. Gore jetting around on private aircraft, living in a mansion, driving SUV's, and a houseboat that burns more energy in a day than I do in a month.

Just in Case ObamaCare Misses Controlling Any Aspect of Your Life

Apparently the current leading environmental doomsayer is a professor of some sort from Australia, Tim Flannery. He's pushing for an international government to monitor every aspect of everyone's life. The House of (un)Representatives has passed 'Cap and Trade' which is the first step to total government control here. I previously posted how the new ObamaCare will gain control of almost everything. Just in case they missed anything, Obama and his Statist buddies in government and the MSM are advocating for this catch all Copenhagen proposal. Flannery: “We all too often mistake the nature of those negotiations in Copenhagen.” “We think of them as being concerned with some sort of environmental treaty. That is far from the case. The negotiations now ongoing toward the Copenhagen agreement are in effect diplomacy at the most profound global level. They deal with every aspect of our life and they will influence every aspect of our life, our economy, our society.” (emphasis mine)

Here are some of the extraordinary things being developed. Do you think the house you own is yours? Under cap and trade, if you sell your house, it must meet government mandated environmental regulations, or you can't sell. Doesn't matter if the house was built two hundred years ago or two years ago. Property rights are part of the foundation of liberty. That's being taken away with this legislation.

In Europe, surely coming to your town, is the “European Landfill Directive.” It mandates 'smart' trash cans. These have chips that monitor your garbage. These are being used by some towns in England, Scotland and Northern Ireland. How long until the technology will develop that will monitor what is in your trash. What did you eat today. Too many chips? Call the Health Police.

Think going to the bathroom is a private act? There's a toilet out, the VIP (Versatile Interactive Pan), that examines your waste. I reported earlier the movement to require everyone to use single ply TP. It may be illegal in the near future to use soft cushy two-ply.

An important control for Statists is travel. Whether the Soviet Union or Communist China, the movement of every citizen is monitored. I say 'is' for the Soviet Union because KGB trained dictator Putin is putting back in place all the soviet apparatchik. The travel control being implemented in Europe, and I'm sure here soon, is that if you fly, in addition to frequent flyer miles, you will have to pay additional prohibitive charges for "excessive" flying. Of course Al Gore in his gas guzzling private jet will be exempt.

Thomas Friedman, a popular Statist writer, sums their view nicely: “One-party autocracy certainly has its drawbacks.” “But when it is led by a reasonably enlightened group of people, as China is today, it can also have great advantages. That one party can just impose the politically difficult but critically important policies needed to move a society forward in the 21st century.”

Communist China where there's no freedom of the press, no freedom of religion, no free speech, where the states murders, tortures or imprisons dissidents, regulates travel...yeah, there's a great political model. What were those stupid Founding Fathers thinking of creating a constitution that ensured liberty for the people? Obviously tyranny and totalitarianism is the way to go.